Posts Tagged ‘Elderly Problems’

Can you pass a simple Alzheimer’s test?)

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Fwd: from dave@pen-site.com

 

 Can you pass a simple Alzheimer’s test?

 

 
 1- Find the C below…do not use any cursor help.

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

2- If you already found the C, now find the 6 below.

99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
69999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

3 – Now find the N below. It’s a little more difficult.

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

This is NOT a joke. If you were able to pass these three tests, you can cancel your annual visit to your neurologist. Your brain is great and you’re far from having a close relationship with Mr Alzheimer.
 
I’m only sending this to my ‘old’ friends.
 

Eonvrye whocan raed this rsaie your hnad.

To my ’selected’ strange-minded friends:

If you can read the following paragraph, forward it on to your friends and the person that sent it to you with ‘yes’ in the subject line… Only great minds can read this
This is weird, but interesting!

If you can raed this, you have a sgtrane mnid too

Can you raed this? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

I cdnuolt blveiee that I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd what I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno’t mtaetr in what oerdr the ltteres in a word are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is that the frsit and last ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raed it whotuit a pboerlm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the word as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! If you can raed this forwrad it

FORWARD ONLY IF YOU CAN READ IT  

Forward it & put ‘YES’ in the Subject Line

Just Calling to say hello

Friday, May 7th, 2010
BoomerYearbook.com

BoomerYearbook.com

 

From Sheran Cohen: Fowarded to BoomerYearbook.com

 
http://justcallingtosayhello.webs.com/
 
Please think of us for any of your clients who could benefit from getting a personal call to insure their safety or just to say hello. Calling services for all areas of the USA! Rates as low as $30 per month, business plans available.
Our team have various levels of experience in the health care field to triage possible issues and offer reporting to the subscribing party on “no answer” calls.
 
Thank you in advance from the “Just calling to say hello team”!

Foward from “American Solutions” by Vince Haley

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

 From American Solutions: http://www.americansolutions.com/

New-Logo-Email-Template

 American Solutions General Chairman Newt Gingrich recently wrote an article in the Washington Post that has annoyed a few people, including it seems, President Obama.In this article, Gingrich repeats an earlier assertion that President Obama is “the most radical president in American history” and describes with several examples how the governing team of Obama-Pelosi-Reid operates as a “secular socialist machine.”It appears that describing Obama administration policies as “socialist” is more than President Obama and his defenders can stand. They seek to marginalize any serious discussion of whether President Obama is indeed attempting to impose socialist programs on American society.Consider President Obama’s remarks this past weekend at the University of Michigan:

The… way to keep our democracy healthy is to maintain a basic level of civility in our public debate…. Throwing around phrases like “socialist” and “Soviet-style takeover;” “fascist” and “right-wing nut” may grab headlines, but it also has the effect of comparing our government, or our political opponents, to authoritarian, and even murderous regimes.

… The problem is that this kind of vilification and over-the-top rhetoric closes the door to the possibility of compromise. It undermines democratic deliberation. It prevents learning – since after all, why should we listen to a “fascist” or “socialist” or “right-wing nut?” It makes it nearly impossible for people who have legitimate but bridgeable differences to sit down at the same table and hash things out. It robs us of a rational and serious debate that we need to have about the very real and very big challenges facing this nation.

The President would have us believe that using the term “socialist” undermines democratic deliberation and robs us of rational and serious debate about the challenges facing our country. 

We disagree completely and believe that assessing Obama administration policies as socialist or not serves a very useful purpose.  We believe that people can learn a lot about socialism when examining many of the Obama administration policies.

Here a few examples:

  • The recently passed healthcare bill is a government takeover by regulation of approximately one-sixth of the economy. It will raise taxes by almost $1 trillion dollars over the next ten years and insurance premiums and associated healthcare costs will likely continue to go up each year. 
  • President Obama supports an economy wide cap and trade system, which he believes will strengthen job creation. Opponents believe that a cap and trade system will kill jobs and lead to government control of the entire U.S. economy, or, in other words, a socialist means of government control and of taxing and redistributing wealth to politically favored constituencies.
  • A free market economy is about rewarding companies that produce high quality products at a competitive cost and allowing them to fail when they are unable to deliver value at a price consumers are willing to pay.  A socialist approach is for the government to bail out companies with taxpayer dollars and then manage them, even though we already have an established bankruptcy process in this country for the orderly reorganization of failing companies.  President Obama chose the socialist approach when he bailed out General Motors and Chrysler. 
  • During the 2008 presidential campaign Barack Obama said “When you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody”.  This world view is socialist in perspective, especially when you consider the spreader of the wealth is the federal government.  Well it’s time to get ready for some more wealth being spread around because the Obama Administration is talking about introducing an entirely new form of taxation to the U.S.  It’s called the Value -Added Tax (VAT), and it functions as a national sales tax on materials and goods at the production level, which will be passed along to the consumer in the form of higher prices on everything that is purchased.

These are a few of many examples in which President Obama’s administration has or is trying to increase the size and power of the federal government in a manner that justifies the term socialist.

We believe the American people can decide for themselves whether certain terms reflect their understanding of reality.  At American Solutions, we will continue to use the terms we believe accurately reflect the direction of this Administration.

Over the coming months in this election year we expect a vibrant national debate about the direction of this administration and what words most accurately define it. 

Along the way, we will be providing you with updates on the actions of the “Secular-Socialist Machine” and asking for your feedback and help in stopping it.

Sincerely,
Vince-Signature
Vince Haley
Vice President for Policy
American Solutions

P.S.   We’re in Greenville, South Carolina today, May 5, for another stop on our Real Jobs tour. You can watch the event live at 6:30 PM ET by going here: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/the-real-jobs-summit.

P.P.S.  If you wish to read more about how President Obama’s administration is rightfully considered to be pursuing socialist policies, we recommend Jonah Goldberg’s article in the latest issue of Commentary, ” What Kind of Socialist Is Barack Obama?

FTAF 6
ContributeButton

This email was sent by: American Solutions for Winning the Future
1425 K Street N.W., Washington, DC, 20005, USA

We respect your right to privacy – view our policy

 

 

 

 

Update Profile and Subscription Preferences | Unsubscribe From All Emails

From a California school teacher – - – Cheap Tomatoes

Thursday, May 6th, 2010
BoomerYearbook.com

BoomerYearbook.com

Cheap Tomatoes  

This English teacher has phrased it the best I’ve seen yet. 
Tomatoes and Cheap Labor

CHEAP TOMATOES?
This should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or Independent 

From a California school teacher – - - 

“As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of:

I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average lower socioeconomic and income levels

Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens , Huntington Park , etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools. 

Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I’m not talking a glass of milk and roll — but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten.

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have 
cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids.

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing
funding
 for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America .. 

I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students, here in the country less then 3 months, who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them “Putas”(whores) and throwing things, that the teachers were in tears. 

Free medical, free education, free food, free day care etc., etc, etc.  Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs. 

Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases. For me, I’ll pay more for tomatoes. 

Americans, We need to wake up.

It does, however, have everything to do with culture: It involves an American third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate, and an 
American culture that has become so weak and worried aboutpolitical correctness  that we don’t have the will to do anything about it. 

If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know. 

CHEAP LABOR? Isn’t that what the whole immigration issue is about?

Business doesn’t want to pay a decent wage. 

Consumers don’t want expensive produce. 

Government will tell you Americans don’t want the jobs.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase “cheap labor” is myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as “cheap labor.” 

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, 
he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an “earned income credit” of up to $3,200 free. 

He qualifies for 
Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps.

He qualifies for 
free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His 
children get free breakfasts and lunches at school. 

He 
requires bilingual teachers and books.

He
 qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If 
they are, or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI.  If qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicaid.   All of this is at (our) taxpayer’s expense

He doesn’t worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits. 

Working Americans
are lucky to have $5.00 or $6..00/hour left after paying their bills and his. 

Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT!

THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS OF EITHER PARTY. ‘AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON’T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM .

Please pass this on to as many as possible.  Immigration legislation is to be considered in 2010.  This is important to working Americans, our economy and our American culture and heritage..

 

A lesson to be learned from Greece

Thursday, May 6th, 2010
BoomerYearbook.com

BoomerYearbook.com

 

By Joseph J Kusnell
 
 
There is a lesson to be learned from Greece. Like us, they hired too many state workers. Like us they overpaid them. Like us they gave them unsustainable benefits including in some cases 55 year retirement with FULL life-time benefits.
 
When Greece couldn’t sustain this giveaway, their financial house of cards collapsed but the workers could care less. They have been overpaid and using taxpayers money for years. But now, it has dried up. There is no money. Do they care? No. They are selfish and they are stupid.
 
They seem to think by rioting, more money will be generated.  Then they can continue on their own gravy train even if the other taxpayers are forced into tax-bankruptcy.
 
What these morons don’t seem to understand is that there is no money. The money they have been stealing for years has run out. An adjustment is needed.
 
That’s the trouble with getting people used to more than they are worth. When you eventually have to cut them back, they can’t handle it.
 
I wouldn’t want to be running any government that had to correct this type situation. It is not likely to be peaceful.
 
Our unions at GM are like this. Do anything to anyone but not to us. After all, “we earn our money!”. THEY bankrupted GM but don’t blame them! Let the taxpayer bail them out just as long as they continue to get what they have been getting or close to it.
 
lol
 
I have a friend who is a steel rod-setter. He and his wife have a $500,000.00 home in the suburbs. He will tell you “We earned every bit of that money”.
 
In what society is a rod setter worth that kind of money? If he is worth that, what must a doctor be worth? Or an engineer? BUT, doctors and engineers aren’t unionized.
 
And what does this do to a nation’s economy? Well, it can destroy it if labor’s demands are excessive. Or it can drive employers to seek cheaper labor if they are.
In America they were so –  
 
How about if all those Greek government workers were replaced with cheaper labor? The country would recover quickly. The government workers wouldn’t. 
 
Unions are composed of a lot of politically and economically uninformed people; hence, it’s hard to tell that them the truth about anything. They won’t hear it. Instead they riot.
 
Better them than us.
 
But our day might be coming if we don’t straighten out our act soon.
 
Joe

Facebook Privacy Settings: Fowarded from the office of Congressman Steve King

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Facebook to Share Your Info for Money

Updated: Wednesday, 28 Apr 2010, 10:36 AM EDT
Published : Tuesday, 27 Apr 2010, 11:01 PM EDT

 

Fowarded from:

Sandy.Hanlon@mail.house.gov

 

Sandy Hanlon

Regional Representative

Congressman Steve King

526 Nebraska Street

Sioux City, Iowa 51101

(712) 224-4692 phone

(712) 224-4693 fax

sandy.hanlon@mail.house.gov

Sign up for Steve King’s E-Newsletter at http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm
Follow Steve King on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/SteveKingIA
Follow
Steve King on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RepSteveKing

MINNEAPOLIS – Facebook is now sharing your personal profile information with third parties. For now, it’s just a few web sites, like the music site Pandora, and the consumer review site, Yelp.

Facebook is automatically sharing that information, without your consent. If you don’t want to share, you have to opt out.

University of Minnesota law professor and privacy expert Bill McGevern says it’s an important line in the sand. And for Facebook, with 600 million users, the stakes are high.

“Facebook is trying over and over to get this shared so Facebook becomes the center of the web,” said McGevern.

Facebook wants to make money by selling user information.

Last week, Facebook announced new features designed to unlock more of the data accumulated about its users during its six-year history. The senators said the recent changes by Facebook fundamentally alter the relationship between users and the social networking site. Before the change, users had control over what information they wished to share publicly and what information they wanted to keep private.

Among other things, Facebook is plugging into other websites so people can communicate their interests with friends, colleagues and acquaintances online. Facebook also changed its own website to create more pages where users’ biographical information could be exposed to a wider audience.

In a statement, Facebook said, “these new products and features are designed to enhance personalization and promote social activity. All of Facebook’s partner sites interact with a user’s consent.”

Mexico’s laws tougher on immigration: Fowarded from the office of Congressman Steve King

Monday, May 3rd, 2010
 

 Click here for article  below in the Washington Times.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/

 Sandy Hanlon

Regional Representative

Congressman Steve King

526 Nebraska Street

Sioux City, Iowa 51101

(712) 224-4692 phone

(712) 224-4693 fax

sandy.hanlon@mail.house.gov

Sign up for Steve King’s E-Newsletter at http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm
Follow Steve King on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/SteveKingIA
Follow
Steve King on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RepSteveKing

 

 

_____________________________________________
From: Boggess, Jacqueline
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 8:19 AM
Subject: Washington Times

“This sounds like the kind of law that a rational nation would have to protect itself against illegal immigrants — that would stop and punish the very people who are violating the law,” said Rep. Steve King of Iowa, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, citizenship, refugees, border security and international law.

“Why would Mr. Calderon have any objections to an Arizona law that is less draconian than his own, one he has pledged to enforce?” Mr. King said.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/

Mexico’s illegals laws tougher than Arizona’s

Calderon condemns ‘racial discrimination’

By Jerry Seper

Mexican President Felipe Calderon denounced as “racial discrimination” an Arizona law giving state and local police the authority to arrest suspected illegal immigrants and vowed to use all means at his disposal to defend Mexican nationals against a law he called a “violation of human rights.”

But the legislation, signed April 23 by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, is similar to Reglamento de la Ley General de Poblacion — the General Law on Population enacted in Mexico in April 2000, which mandates that federal, local and municipal police cooperate with federal immigration authorities in that country in the arrests of illegal immigrants.

Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.

The law also says Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” violate Mexican law, are not “physically or mentally healthy” or lack the “necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents.

“This sounds like the kind of law that a rational nation would have to protect itself against illegal immigrants — that would stop and punish the very people who are violating the law,” said Rep. Steve King of Iowa, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, citizenship, refugees, border security and international law.

“Why would Mr. Calderon have any objections to an Arizona law that is less draconian than his own, one he has pledged to enforce?” Mr. King said.

Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona, the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on terrorism and homeland security, described Mr. Calderon’s comments as “hypocritical to say the least.”

“I would have expected more from Mr. Calderon,” said Mr. Kyl, who serves as the Senate minority whip. “We are spending millions of dollars to help Mexico fight the drug cartels that pose a threat to his government, and he doesn’t seem to recognize our concerns. He ought to be apologizing to us instead of condemning us.”

Mr. Kyl, along with fellow Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, has introduced a 10-point comprehensive border security plan to combat illegal immigration, drug and human smuggling, and violent crime along the southwestern border. It includes the deployment of National Guard troops, an increase in U.S. Border Patrol agents and 700 miles of fencing, along with other equipment and funding upgrades.

He said skyrocketing violence on the border, including the recent killing of an Arizona rancher by an illegal immigrant he had gone to assist, has not gone unnoticed by the public, adding that until the federal government provides the necessary funding and manpower to adequately secure the southwestern border, Arizona will not long remain the only state to pass legislation to do it on its own.

Jacqueline Boggess
Press Assistant
Congressman Steve King
202-225-4426 (P)

202-225-3193 (F)
  Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)  Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)   Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)
Sign up for Steve King’s E-Newsletter at http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm

John Kanzius:Inventor of the Cancer Killing Radio Wave Machine UPDATE

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Dear Baby Boomers:

A POTENTIAL CURE FOR CANCER MAY BE RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER.

PLEASE TAKE A MINUTE AND READ THE FOLLOWING BOOMERYEARBOOK.COM ARTICLE REVIEWING THE KANZIUS CANCER INVENTION. THEN GOOGLE
“THE KANZIUS CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION” FOR INFORMATION ON THIS EXCITING POTENTIAL TREATMENT. (www.kanziuscancerresearch.com/)

(Note: BoomerYearbook.com is not affiliated with the Kanzius Cancer Research Foundation Foundation.)

 

 

A Review of John Kanzius’ Thermal Destruction of Cancer Cells

By Dr. Karen for Boomeryearbook.com

 

BoomerYearbook.com

BoomerYearbook.com

 

 

What is Thermal Destruction of Cancer Cells? John Kanzius says he uses radio waves in a noninvasive way to heat nanoparticles which can kill cancer. John Kanzius is not a doctor. In fact he holds no degrees at all, not even a college bachelor degree. Who is he? He is a man, like so many, diagnosed with cancer.

Five years ago, John was informed that he has b-cell leukemia. John understood and witnessed first hand the devastation the current cancer treatment wrecked on one’s body and spirit; seeing the hopeful smiling faces starting chemo therapy and radiation turn sickly and zombie like as treatment progressed. These difficult, toxic cancer treatment sessions prompted him to invent the use of radio wave frequencies to kill cancer. So, John started working in his garage. Since childhood, John had been fascinated by radio waves. He soon discovered that nanoparticles and other molecules can be heated with radio waves and that cancerous cells are eradicated! In testing he discovered, that cancer cells could be eradicated, without side effects, in an 8 week period of time!

John Kanzius, sans the professional degree, has worked as owner and operator of a radio station and also engineered and managed TV stations. Radio waves were a childhood fascination and a major component of his adult work. Prior to Kanzius’ breakthrough, using radio waves to cure cancer had not been an avenue pursued by ANY mainstream researchers. Contrary, researchers have concentrated their efforts on drugs, surgery and other medical cancer treatment interventions. Now, thanks to Kanzius’ pioneering work, researchers are finding solutions through the science of physics. When John was queried as to what made him think he could invent a cure for cancer?, he responded, “no one else had done it.”

This possible cure gives many people hope but unfortunately, it is quite likely that the inventor himself might succumb to his cancer prior to benefiting from it as a curative cancer treatment. Preparing for such a scenario, John Kanzius has proactively made arrangements for his discovery to be handled by a corporation, and ensured that his hometown in PA could benefit once the FDA gave approval for the Radio Wave Machine’s use in killing cancer. It means a lot to his hometown in Erie county. The machine to cure some of the worst cancers, manufactured and then conducted at their local cancer center, will put the small town of Erie PA on the world’s map. It’s anticipated, that once instituted and approved, that visiting cancer patients will be coming in from all over the world.

Is it a little too early to call it a cure? Maybe? but the medical profession is very hopeful. The FDA has given Kanzius testing phase approval to receive international patients. The county of Erie is excited about the economic growth that will likely be experienced if the treatment is approved. It could mean a 10 billion increase in revenue for the county. A lot of key people and resources are behind Kanzius. Dr. Stephen Curly is a surgical oncologist and does cancer research at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. Curly said, “This has the most fascinating potential I’ve seen in anything in my twenty years of cancer research.” Dr. Curly continues to provide fund raising support so the research can continue at it’s miracle accelerated pace.

We at Boomer Yearbook will continue to follow John Kanzius’s Radio Wave Cancer Killing Machine and update you regularly. We hope you will write in to us and let us know what you think. We’d love to hear from you.

www.boomeryearbook.com is a social networking site connecting the Baby Boomer generation. Share your thoughts, rediscover old friends, or expand your mind with brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join today to discover the many ways we are helping Boomers connect for fun and profit.

A Cure for Cancer

Monday, April 12th, 2010
 
                                          A Cure for Cancer
 
I wish to ask you – the reader – a question that I suspect you have heard before. But, I am going to ask it anyway just to get started. Please read this entire letter, this is the hottest thing in Cancer treatment in America today.
 
Over a billion dollars is spent each year on cancer. This includes cancer research, cancer treatments and cancer drugs. Clinics, research facilities and hospitals run on money donated to find a cure of cancer. What if they found out that a new process could cure many types of cancer without expensive treatments, without expense drugs, and with no side effects?  Would these groups greet the news with elation or dismay?
 
Let’s paint a scenario: You are the President and CEO of a billion-dollar Pharmaceutical company that markets cancer-fighting drugs. These drugs are very expensive and you sell many hundreds of millions of dollars worth each and every year. Your company employs 2,300 people who work in sales, research, administration and accounting. In other words, you are a highly successful billion-dollar corporation that is doing quite well.
 
One day an employee of the research department rushes into your office. He is obviously very exited. When he catches his breath, he let’s you in on his news. “Chief, we have just found a cure for cancer!”
 
“You have,” you ask him guardedly.
 
“Yes, sir, tomatoes!”
 
“Tomatoes? Tomatoes cure cancer? Regular home grown variety ordinary tomatoes?”
 
“Yes sir, regular tomatoes. Taken in a certain way, they cure cancer with no side effects at all! And Chief, you can grow you own in your yard so you can cure yourself and it won’t cost you anything! Isn’t that great!!!”
 
How do you respond? Now I am sure the thought of curing cancer is something you have often paid lip service to, but now that you as the CEO of this giant pharmaceutical are faced with a cure, how do you feel? What do you say?
 
As you stare at your employee you begin to feel ill. You can see your job, your company, the jobs of all 2,300 employees, all the shareholders money and many others affiliated with the work you do all being ruined overnight. You are going to lose hundreds of millions of dollars not this year, but this year, next year, the year after that, and every year forever. You are about to lose billions of dollars and your job.
 
How do you respond?
 
We all would love to say we stand up and shout, “Praise the Lord!” because we are all good people and curing cancer is a wonderful thing – something we had dedicated our life to or at least seemed to. But if you think that, you are more than a bit naive.
I am not going to carry this any further and I am not going to say the CEO would bury the cure because I don’t know what would happen. But what I do know is nobody making a fortune off a disease is truly dedicated to curing that disease. Treating it yes, curing it, no.
 
Do you know how new drugs are brought to market? A pharmaceutical company with a research lab discovers this drug they think might treat a certain disease. They present their facts to the FDA and ask for approval for a Clinical Trial. Sometimes the National Institute of Health will give a grant to a company to run a trial but at others the company will pay for the trial themselves if the FDA gives them the okay to go ahead.
 
So they begin their trial. First, they run a Phase 1 with a few people. If that is successful then they run a Phase II with more people. If that is successful then they run a Phase III with even more people. If that is successful they petition the FDA for approval to market their drug. They may have spent a couple of hundred million dollars on this trial but if the drug gets approval, they can sell it and recoup their money and make a lot more. It’s a big stake gamble but that’s what they do. That’s why they put up the money for the trial.
 
The FDA is empowered to make the final decision but everyone is aware that the Drug Company has a huge financial investment in that drug and – well we’ll let it go there.
 
Now back to the tomato cure. In order to be sure the tomato cure works and has no bad side effects, we have to run just such a Clinical Trial. And to run that trial, someone has to pay the hundreds of millions of dollars that are needed.
 
Do you think any pharmaceutical company that is basically going to be put out of business if this trial is successful is going to offer to pick up the tab? I don’t think so. Okay then, where is the money to come from?
 
Well, one way is for the Federal Government to – through the National Institute of Health – pick up the cost of the tomato trials. Actually that’s about the only way. And if the FDA won’t or can’t put up that money, the trials may simply be put on the back burner and things will go back to normal.
 
Now just to explain: we are dealing here with a maybe – maybe the tomatoes will work and maybe there will be great success and maybe there will be NO side affects. But we won’t know that until we finish these very expensive tests. And convincing the government that it should put all that money into tests on tomatoes may be a hard sell since if the tomatoes don’t work, a lot of people are going to point fingers in their direction.
 
So maybe the tomato tests will get run and maybe they won’t. Or maybe they cut the money way down and try just a little test and if that works, try a little bigger test and so on and so on. And maybe they will and maybe they won’t. And why the uncertainty?
Because no one is going to make any money from this discovery so no one is going to invest any of his money in it. Certainly, cancer may be cured but while that may be a great thing for we-the-people, it isn’t so great for these particular companies.
They could end up out of business and a lot of their lives ruined. You can’t expect them to voluntarily contribute to their own demise.
 
Now why am I writing this. Well, because someone like this is going on right now outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania where a new cancer treating technique that proponents think will cure many cancers with no side effects and no expensive treatments or drugs, is languishing for lack of sufficient money to move it forward.
This is not some third world miracle drug, or something off the back shelf. This is not some goofy idea promulgated by a disbarred doctor. No, this is a process invented by a man who had cancer and died from his cancer a few months ago, before his machine could be used on him. This is an idea that has gotten a lot of publicity and a lot of attention and may well be the best idea in cancer treatment in the past 50 years. But it has a couple of problems. It is NOT expensive, it uses NO high-priced drugs, and there are NO side effects.
 
The tests of this treatment to date have been 100% successful and they have been conducted in some of our finest cancer research facilities. But it is time to move forward through the next stage, i.e. human tests. This takes money, in fact about 12 million dollars over the next two years. Where is that money going to come from? Who will benefit from this cure? We will. Those of us are afraid of cancer, those of us who have cancer, those of us who have loved ones that have had cancer. WE are the ones to put up the money to drive these tests forward. Or nobody will. The hospitals have been getting some money but we need to raise 12 million to get this done!
 
This has been called the best new idea in cancer treatment in 50 years. Okay then I say we find 100,000 people who will contribute $100 each to the hospitals that are conducting the tests on The Kanzius Machine. (The Kanzius machine is named after its inventor John Kanzius, recently deceased from cancer. Sadly John’s own machine could not be used on him since it is illegal to use devices such as this one before they receive FDA approval so the doctors couldn’t do it.) 
 
At this time, I want you to cut and paste the following link and go read about The Kanzius Foundation. Read about this marvelous potential cure for many types of cancers not ten years or twenty years from now but as soon as the trials are finished and the results approved which could be within five years. Here’s the link: read the rest of this article and then go to the link and read all about the Foundation. It was featured twice on 60 Minutes and created quite a stir.
 
 
Okay so now you know, this is very promising but they need lots of money to get it done. Whatever you give is tax deductible but $100 from 100,000 of us should do the trick. Checks can be made (as outlined in the link) to The Kanzius Foundation in Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
Come on folks, this is for us. After all, we can’t reasonably expect those people or corporations that are going to lose so much money if this is successful, to chip in to put themselves out of business. This is something we have to do for ourselves. Write your check today. It’s the best $100 bucks you will ever spend.
 
Send it to THE KANZIUS FOUNDATION at the address on the link: We CAN cure Cancer. You and me – so let’s do it now. A good man died to bring us this idea which he conceived at Children’s Hospital in Philadelphia watching kids die of Cancer as he stood there crying helplessly. We can make his dream a reality if you will help. So, what do you say – are you willing to make the effort? After all, the life you save may be your own or that a loved one or friend. You just never know where Cancer is going to strike next.
 
Thank you and please, pass this on. It’s really up to us this time.
 
Joseph J Kusnell
Philadelphia, Pa.
Chonors686@Aol.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Dear Glenn Beck

Thursday, April 8th, 2010
The Cunning Plan: BoomerYearbook.com

The Cunning Plan: BoomerYearbook.com

Glen,

The attack on your is what happens to heroes. If the other side wasn’t being hurt, they would ignore you. Their attacks prove you are getting through to the people.

The people on the left are underhanded, vicious, vitriolic, and phony. They have done worse than any of the people they criticize. They are despicable and degenerate. Consider the very ugly Bill Mayer or Code Pink or so many liberal Black activists. They rant and rave and revile anyone that opposes them saying whatever pops into their mind without regard to truth or consequences and then complain bitterly if the other side does half as much in return. They care nothing for the truth and to try to engage them in an exchange of ideas is futile. They don’t want to learn, they want to indoctrinate.

The conversion of American discourse to this state is all but unbelievable. I say “all but” because looking back at history, you can see where the same thing has happened time and time again. The difference is that I never thought it could happen here. But it has and in surprisingly short order.

Glen, I have heard the liberals on the left are trying to run you off the air. That is unacceptable. We need to keep you on the air so I am wondering what you think of some of us trying to form a sort of PAC with people willing to pledge $5 or $10 a month on a recurring basis in order to raise one million dollars a month with which to buy commercial time on your Fox News to protect you from them.

The word is your show is losing sponsors who are afraid of the intimidators and whose commitment to free speech may not be as strong as their commitment to profits. I have also read that Fix has lost a million dollars a month in sponsorship for the Glen Beck Show. Is that true? Is that what it would take to keep you on the air?

Glen, there are 20 million people that listen to conservative talk radio. At least three or four million that identify themselves as belonging to the Tea Party group. And another (many overlaps of course) 2 million that listen to your Fox show every night. From that group all we need is about 100,000 folks to support you with an average $10 monthly contribution if a million-a-month is the magic number.

I can’t believe that would be so hard to do. But we would need an organization that understands how to handle that much money, how to dispense it, what records have to be kept since the Administration will be all over them, and we need to be assured that a million a month is enough to do the trick.

Of course someone has to run the group and get paid but we would hope that we could do that with one guy working out of his own office so the overhead for this would be kept at a minimum.

Do you have any thoughts? Would it work? Is it necessary? Is there anyone that you know that has the background to run with this and make it happen?

I know and you know our country is teetering on the brink of a disaster and most Americans don’t even know it. Your show is one of the places they can learn the truth. We need to keep you on the air.

Finally, take care of yourself. Trust no one. These are animals that will do whatever they must do to get what they want. Thugs, thieves, liars, and cheats – and people to whom violence is simply a tool to be used to achieve an objective. After all as Chairman Mao did say, political power comes from the barrel of a gun and that is not lost on them. So watch yourself.

Is this still America, Glen? I am 81 and I can’t believe what has happened to us in just over one year. Nor can I believe that so many of the more traditional elements of the Democratic Party seem to be going along with these Marxists and anti-American revolutionaries without so much as a whimper. Soon they will have convinced our people that the very word America is something to be ashamed of.

The Lady in the Statute must certainly have a tear in her eye for her liberty that is being lost.

So if you think this can be done or you know someone to head this up, let’s get started. Save the Glen Beck Show for America’s Sake.

That’s the ticket.

Joe Kusnell
Philadelphia, Pa