Posts Tagged ‘psychological article’

1. Promiscuous Baby Boomers: The Secrets of a Lusty Generation

Saturday, November 7th, 2009

byb-sex-and-condom-dreamstime_1008085711

By Dr. Karen for Boomeryearbook.com

Much of the freedom enjoyed by baby boomers when they launched their free love crusade of the rest of the World back in their wild days was enabled by their being free of the risk of diseases, such as AIDs, or so they thought. Our present young generation have no such ‘safety net’ and dare not indulge in promiscuity.

Psychological articles note that the presence of the AIDs risk has effectively reduced the incidence of promiscuity in young people, although of course there will always be exceptions to the rule. Before baby boomers came along, the stigma of unwanted pregnancy dominated the moral code of young girls who simply were not prepared to take the risk of ‘getting into trouble’.

Contraceptive sheaths were in use, however, condoms were an item exclusively bought by men in the fifties – few women would buy them – therefore contraception was largely left to the discretion of men.

American women’s rights campaigner Margaret Sanger, who coined the phrase ‘birth control’, raised $150,000 to fund the development of the first human contraceptive pill first invented by Carl Djerassi at a laboratory in Mexico in 1951 and with the advent of the pill, sexual freedom reigned supreme in the back seats of cars just about everywhere, until widespread AIDS put a stop to all the fun.

The secrets of the lustiest generation the World has ever seen were in fact simply a matter of risk calculation. Women with no control over their own birth control were simply not prepared to put their trust in men when it came to contraception. Once these women had the insurance of self-contraception, their sexual interests expanded considerably. Far from having a lower sex drive than men, women are every bit as keen on sex as their male counterparts.
Decades later, baby boomers continue to enjoy far greater sexual freedom than previous or subsequent generations. Why is this? Psychological articles suggest that this is merely the legacy of their own attitude to sex and their determination to make their own minds up about their sexual liberation and their right to enjoy a sex life on their own terms.

The fifties and sixties saw a sexual revolution that blew inhibitions out of the water: the baby boomers generation are simply masters of their own fate and refuse to be coerced into a regimented code of sexual behavior.

The Psychological Article on Promiscuous Baby Boomers: The Secrets of a Lusty Generation is part of Boomer Yearbook’s continuing series of baby boomers psychological coaching tips and how to alleviate elderly problems. We believe knowledge is power. We’d love to hear what you think.

Boomer Yearbook is a Social Network and Psychological Articles for Baby Boomers. Connect with old and new friends, or expand your mind and ward off senior moments and elderly problems with dream analysis and online optical illusions and brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join other Baby Boomers to stay informed, receive weekly Newsfeeds, and let your opinions be heard. Baby boomers changed the world. We’re not done yet!

signup

STEROTYPES OF WOMEN IN AMERICAN POPULAR MUSIC

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Psychological Articles by Boomeryearbook.com

Barbie becomes bimbo: sterotypes as self fulfilling prophesy

Barbie: bimbo or savvy boomer woman?

Currently, our American culture focuses on coherence something we, as civilized humans, strive to make sense of as a way of interpreting our place in the world. However, establishing a woman’s place in American society, free of stereotypical notions, is not usually an easily achieved acquisition, and in fact, is often unattainable. When societal messages become fixed, people close down to other potential interpretative links about individual persons. Oftentimes, this leads to the creation of harmful, generalist stereotypes.

By definition, a stereotype is a generalized image of a person or group, which does not acknowledge individual differences and which is often prejudicial to that person or group. In general, people develop stereotypes when they can’t or are hesitant about trying to get all of the information they need in order to make fair judgments about a person, or a group of people. When this happens, as it most often does, the person judging misses the ‘whole picture.’ Thus, in many cases, stereotyping allows us to ‘fill in the blanks’ and come to erroneous, overly general conclusions. In many cases, the way in which someone is stereotyped becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy. Societal influences are deemed to have pre-eminent importance in the creation of stereotypes, which are usually unfavorable, and can lead to unfair discrimination and persecution. Stereotyping can be viewed as a negative communication circle. It emanates from, and further perpetuates discrimination and racism.

 

 

“I’m a Barbie girl, In a Barbie World, Wrapped in plastic, It’s fantastic, You can brush my hair, Undress me everywhere, Imagination, life is your creation”

 

 

These are the first few lines of a popular song released in the year, 1999 by a band named Aqua. The name of the song is, “Barbie Girl.” It is one of many examples of how a contemporary communications technology can be used to promote a specific idea about a particular type of person. The song was played on the radio and through CD’s and was primarily listened to by young girls. New media technologies have been influentially because they can powerfully impact a wide geographical audience. Thus unfortunately, many young girls strive to become Barbie Girls, and many young boys, treated these “Barbie’s” as objectified dolls, to be handled and played with at will, illustrating John Bargh’s research on the automatic behavior priming effect; wherein, social behavior not necessarily mediated by conscious choice, becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy.

 

 Mediums such as television, Internet, magazines, and radio have become the babysitters of both the younger and older members of society. As media technologies continue to multiply their number of users, they also find themselves increasing the influence they share over the population. Although some forms of media are used to encourage positive learning, there are many forms of communication that promote the exact opposite. Contemporary communications technologies can be a risk to children who are highly influenced by what they see and hear in the media. It is doubtful than any mother would consciously strive to have her daughter be a “Barbie Girl” yet, millions of mothers and daughters, have fallen prey to the mass communications advertising that being a “Barbie Girl” is desirable. It takes songs like the one from Aqua, as well as other forms of communicative messages to expose the true negativity of the Barbie image as little more than a horrible stereotype about an ideal woman.

 
Media sources are important influences on people’s ideas about social reality, and popular music has provided various perspectives on the lives of women. Images vary; but a fat woman is rarely considered attractive, and thus, also becomes the object of unconscious automatic behavior priming, discrimination and abuse. Sometimes females are portrayed as naive, virginal, submissive creatures in need of male protection, adoration, and direction. At other times women are cast as wild, wicked, lustful beings that are guilty of heartbreaking, home wrecking, as well as other forms of unruly behavior. Popular music is considered to be a significant socializing mechanism that both transmits and reflects norms regarding all social behavior, including the way males and females act and react. The symbolic realm of society, especially the media, assists people in a society to affirm and maintain these gender role pictures even when the images do not reflect reality.

 
The female role in the development of music over the millennia certainly must have been dramatic. Today, women’s voices are heard nationally through all the various forms of technology. However, because of our material culture, their voices seem reduced to commercial opportunism, deprecated by the effect of money, MTV, and the unrealistic Barbie stereotype. Unfortunately, women in today’s society are still subjugated to whatever role provides for the optimum profit of the dominant group running the music industry. The reproduction of gender stereotypes, myths, and role models by this media perpetuates and mirrors the view of women in modern society. From a “making” perspective, women in American society, as represented in popular music, have a long way to go before they are viewed as individuals; i.e., not stereotypical “Barbie Girl” objects.

The Psychological Article on STEROTYPES OF WOMEN IN AMERICAN POPULAR MUSIC is part of Boomer Yearbook’s continuing series of baby boomers psychological coaching tips and how to alleviate elderly problems. We believe knowledge is power. We’d love to hear what you think.

Boomer Yearbook is a Social Network and Psychological Articles for Baby Boomers. Connect with old and new friends, or expand your mind and ward off senior moments and elderly problems with dream analysis and online optical illusions and brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join other Baby Boomers to stay informed, receive weekly Newsfeeds, and let your opinions be heard. Baby boomers changed the world. We’re not done yet!

signup

PAY ATTENTION CHILDREN, THIS IS THE NEW, NEW MATH – OBAMA STYLE!

Sunday, May 31st, 2009
The New Math

The New Math

The rules for running a successful business have changed under Barack Obama.

Now it’s been made much simpler. We take GM as an example:

1. Stiff your shareholders. That should save you billions of dollars.
2. Stiff your bondholders. That’s more billions saved.
3. Stiff the taxpayer. That’s a bunch more billions.
4. Close down your big plants.
5. Close down many of your honest, investing dealerships.
6. Get rid of non-union employees that didn’t vote for you.
7. Reduce salaries and bonuses of CEO’s and other non-union personnel
blaming poor performance all the while excusing the cause of the poor performance which was the employee union.
8. Introduce a new line of teeny-weeny cars that won’t sell but can be made
cheaply enough to hopefully keep the unions in business without asking them
to do anything that might get them mad enough to not vote for you.
9. Show a small profit which should be easy since you just stiffed everyone you
borrowed money from.
10. Accept the bows of the faithful with humility but be certain to continue to control the adoring press so they won’t mention (too often) the deaths of the people driving on America’s high speed, long-distance roadways in these adapted golf carts that get GREAT mileage at the expense of weight and safety.

I look for the new USA/GM to sell off those nasty big, beautiful cars getting 30-35 MPG thanks to the long time investment of IRA and 401K retirees who are now broke because of their government’s intercession in a business they know nothing about.

.
I feel certain countries in South America and the Middle East will buy the Hummer line and their people will love driving it since they plenty of money and gas thanks to their own drilling. We of course do not drill because we are saving the environment from global cooling – or is it global warming – or is it climate change – or could it be from the new Marxist we just put into office here in the good old USA.

Capitalism made these guys what they are today so now they are using their status to destroy it. How nice.

But Americans don’t care, they LOVE Obama. Would they run their homes this way? Not on your life but they love Obama anyway. Do they see any way we can ever pay this huge debt off? No, but so what? It’s not real money is it? And even if it is, the guy has a nice way about him.

And trust me, this new greatly reduced, government and union-owned People ’s Republic car company if it does turn a small profit, will be hailed as a great accomplishment by the Messiah. And never mind the suckers that were cheated out of their life savings or the taxpayers who were ROBBED of billions because union workers were overpaid and under-disciplined and turned out horribly assembled cars which their American compatriots refused to buy. Actually which THEY even refused to buy (check their parking lots). None of that will matter. The “company” (insert ‘union’ here) will have been “saved”.

By Whom – For What?

Take a look at it like this. You go into a mall and rent two run-down stores. You borrow money from the bank to renovate, over $200,000.00 worth. You borrow more money to set up your equipment. Another hundred grand. You borrow money to buy your inventory, hire an advertising company, and hire employees.

Then you open your doors but before you do you announce you have no intention of every paying back any of the money you borrowed to put yourself into business. And on the first day, your receipts total $14,500.00 and your operating expenses total just $9,750.00 so you proudly announce to the world that you have “made a profit” of $4,750.00. They invite you to address the Chamber of Commerce on “How To Start A Successful Business”.

Don’t laugh, that’s what is happening with GM. They may issue worthless shares of stock to people whose money they stole but so what, they just reneged on billions of debt and equity investments so what makes the new shares worth anything.

Was there another way to do this, to try to save the real GM? I think so. First, they should have filed bankruptcy and let the court restructure the debt as well as the labor contracts and retiree benefit program. Then with that out of the way, they could have scaled back their production lines a little without getting in this political environmental nonsense which is a scam.

Finally they could have instituted quality control checks which would assign controls to every production level and identify those workers who do the assembly at each level. With that type accountability in place, and a willingness to discipline those who fail to meet work standards, they could have turned the company around, saved all those jobs, saved the dealerships and maybe given shareholders a chance to see their company bounce back new and lean and strong.

But they didn’t do that because the UNIONS backed Obama and HE OWED THEM. So he couldn’t come down hard on them. He could and did come down on the CEO’s that earned big contractual bonuses despite poor performances while at the same time allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – two governmental agencies that also lost BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars – to pay THEIR CEO’s the same type big bonuses.

The difference? Once again Fannie and Freddie along with their CEO’s were supporters of the Obama ticket and contributed mightily to it. Their CEO’s in fact were part of the Obama campaign.

Obama came out of the Southside of Chicago School of crooked politics and he learned his lessons well. Smile when you get in front of the camera and never let ‘em see you sweat’. When the red light goes out, do whatever the hell you want. And always remember Mr. President, there is a sucker born every minute.

Just last week the President after spending TRILLIONS of dollars said ‘we are out of money’. Really? Let’s see, when we started there were 6% unemployed. Now three trillions dollars later, there are 9.5% unemployed and we are being told this can’t turn around for a year or more. How about that? Do a lousy job and tell folks you expect to do a lousy job and everyone nods and says ‘poor Barack, it’s that damn George Bush’s fault”.

The economy collapsed because the Democratic party insisted that Fannie Mae give trillions of dollars worth of mortgages to people that could not hope to pay them back. When they didn’t pay them back, all hell broke out and the reason is Fannie bought those shaky mortgages, repackaged them and sold them to unwary investors around the world without mentioned that the mortgages should never have been given out in the first place. Who was responsible for that? The Democratic Party of Chris Dodd, Chuck Schummer, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank aided and abetted by the likes of Jim Johnson and Franklin Raines.

They weren’t very bright and to show that they still haven’t learned anything, they just introduced this free money to first time homebuyers program.

Now I don’t object to this one-time credit of $8,000.00 to help people at the lower end of the economic ladder to buy a home. But if they can’t KEEP this home, we are doing once again what Fannie did that lead to this current mess.

You know what they say about doing the same thing in the same way and expecting the results to be different? Well we better watch out because we spent trillions to try to solve this mess already, we don’t have trillion more to spend doing it again. And if they give these homes to people that can’t keep them, we are heading down the same dumb path again.

Here’s what they should do. Any applicant for a first time home buyer’s credit should have to meet every other qualification set for the rest of us who want to buy a home!
They have to be employed, they have to have a work history, they have to make enough money to keep this home, they have to have a decent credit history. They need it all. All the checks and balances that are present for ANY mortgage have to apply for THESE mortgages as well. The only difference should be that the taxpayer is kicking in $8,000.00 to help. That’s the way to do it and not make the same mistake we made before.

Giving people homes they can’t afford and can’t keep is a one way ticket to financial ruin for everyone including the folks trying to get that home.

Recently the Chinese has to lecture us on how to act financially responsible. How about that? China. But they were right. You have to act responsibly.

You’d think we would have learned that by now.

Joey

Articles in Joey’s Comments and Controversy are the express opinions of Joey and not boomeryearbook. However, while non-members can read articles on boomeryearbook.com only members can make comments. Joey’s section is called Joey’s Talk and Controversy for a good reason. In Joey’s words, “I hope I’ve given you food for thought and you will join boomeryearbook and respond”.

www.boomeryearbook.com is a social networking site connecting the Baby Boomer generation. Share your thoughts, rediscover old friends, or expand your mind with brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join today to discover the many ways we are helping Baby Boomers resolve elderly problems and connect for fun and profit.

Boomer Yearbook is Psychological Articles for Baby Boomers. Connect with old and new friends, or expand your mind and ward off senior moments and elderly problems with dream analysis and online optical illusions and brain games provided by clinical psychologist Dr. Karen Turner. Join other Baby Boomers to stay informed, receive weekly Newsfeeds, and let your opinions be heard. Baby boomers changed the world. We’re not done yet!

signup